Horizon Compensation board Chair calls for Standing Compensation Authority

Professor Christopher Hodges OBE, Chair, Horizon Compensation Advisory Board

The Chair of the Horizon Compensation Advisory Board, Professor Chris Hodges, has called for the formation of a new compensation authority, with the statutory power to assess, decide and deliver compensation for victims of scandals.

In a paper recently published on the HCAB section of the government’s website, Professor Hodges believes there is a need for an independent body with statutory powers to provide “quicker and less stressful access to redress” than the current “adversarial” system, which he calls “slow, expensive, and inherently divisive.”

Professor Hodges advocates a government-controlled process, which investigates problems, identifies and mandates the change needed and processes redress quickly. When I asked him how and why victims of a scandal perpetrated by the government should trust the government to put it right, Hodges said it would come via “independence and independent governance [employing] trusted serious people, separate from government, which is what the public sector ombudsmen currently are, they just need more powers.”

Still in the spotlight

Last night, at the National Television Awards, former Subpostmaster Jo Hamilton told an outraged audience:

“I went to Westminster a couple of weeks back and saw the new minister. And trust me, nothing has changed… it’s true… and all of these people behind me haven’t been paid yet. And out of the group of 555, more than 300 haven’t been paid yet, including Sir Alan Bates. They’ve offered him 30% of his claim.”

Given the High Court came down resoundingly in favour of those 555 Subpostmasters in December 2019 – nearly five years ago – you can understand why Jo’s speech caused uproar in O2 last night. When the GLO scheme for the 555 was announced in 2023, the government said everyone who qualified had to be compensated (by law) by August 2024. Beyond the 555 Subpostmasters involved in the High Court action, there are thousands more who have signed up to the Horizon Shortfall Scheme since 2020. As Professor Hodges points out, the HSS scheme has paid out £180m at a cost of £83m.

The whole system is a mess. On Monday the government announced it was reopening the Horizon Shortfall Scheme to those who had already settled their claims, in acknowledgment that the scheme was set up to be unfair, or as the government press release has it: “when the Horizon Shortfall Scheme opened in 2020, some claimants were unable to set out their claim in full. This new appeals process will provide postmasters with the opportunity to have their claim re-assessed with the benefit of new or additional information they can provide.”

There are currently four Subpostmaster compensation schemes which have only managed to pay out a total of £289m to applicants, despite the government setting aside more than £1bn pounds in 2021 to pay for them. The only winners in this are the lawyers.

Not just about the money

In his paper Hodges also suggests victims could be involved in advising on the manner of delivering redress. He writes “there is considerable evidence that the involvement of stakeholders in the design and oversight of arrangements, as well as of trusted independent people, is highly beneficial.”

Interestingly Hodges says this should not just be about money, writing that: “traditional redress is based around providing money as compensation. Yet many victims are suffering from serious psychological harm, which can be made worse by involvement in a long, impersonal, confusing or legalistic process. What they need is care, therapy and support – and quickly. Neither the legalistic redress system (which is inherently adversarial and aggressive, hence making psychological equilibrium worse rather than better) nor the NHS are geared to deliver this currency of response.”

Hodges’ paper refers to existing models in the private sector in this country and wider public sector models in other countries which he says work better. I’m not sure I share his effusiveness about the effectiveness of private sector regulators in the UK, but I think most people would agree that he is right when he says the current system simply does not deliver just outcomes.

Not every scandal has an Alan Bates to lead from the front. And even he has not fixed the problem yet. Though as Jo Hamilton said last night, Sir Alan “has a plan. So when he gets back to the nation for help, please be there to support him.”


The journalism on this blog is crowdfunded. If you would like to join the “secret email” newsletter, please consider making a one-off donation. The money is used to keep the contents of this website free. You will receive irregular, but informative email updates about the Post Office Horizon IT scandal.

8 responses to “Horizon Compensation board Chair calls for Standing Compensation Authority”

  1. “And even [Alan Bates] has not fixed the problem yet.”

    To be fair to Sir Alan, he has neither has the power to fix the problem, nor is it his responsibility to do so. Rather, he is a victim of the problem, albeit an extraordinarily tenacious and pugnacious one.

    1. Is it that power is either used or abused by the few who relish the control that power brings however, when or if accountability or responsibility becomes questionable if held to account for the lack of progress or results then long queues start to build similar to those faced by Sub Post masters on a Monday morning. Horizon was the answer I here. No came the reply. A sticking plaster didn’t work in Space Travel. We’ve more crater’s down here than up there.

  2. Elizabeth Muirhead avatar
    Elizabeth Muirhead

    Bravo.

  3. Hodges “independence and independent governance”, sort of arms length from government then? Like the PO has been during the scandal. That went well!

    Was HCAB independent, has it sorted out the whole compensation thing in quick time after they were formed? Two “Big Beast” Politicians + Two Academics = not a lot of discernable progress.

    Dealt with Financial and Energy Ombudsman myself, both useless. Sorted bank out in court, litigant in person, got costs. Decade on and 2 Energy companies still not billing correctly. Have letter before action x2 but strangely they will not action the threats. Thugs in Suits, part of Gangster Company Culture. Did Ofwat keep our rivers S**T free? Show us how it will work Prof. Hodges.

  4. It is so disappointingly predictable. When Justice Fraser vilified POL in court in 2019 for their treatment of SPMs, flawed operating practices, woeful illegal processes and pitifully inadequate management is it a surprise to anyone that allowing their involvement in any of HSS schemes has resulted in this appalling performance.
    The government outrage, the POL mea culpa, the ongoing and ongoing enquiry are mostly it seems for the delectation of the media to regurgitate to us, the little man to convince us, important people are very concerned.
    The most effective follow-up to the trial victory has been ‘Mr.Bates vs The Post Office’ which really emphasises what makes the government react.
    Sir Alan will no doubt have to return to the courts to drive delivery of redress, but as time ticks by the offenders escape and the victims die in penury.

  5. How is this still not settled? People have had their lives ruined by overpromoted, incompetent, lying, arse covering, pettifogging bureaucrats. Too stupid to understand what they were doing, too focused on lining their own pockets to take notice, too devoid of logic and critical thinking to see something was amiss. Too full of their own importance to admit they were wrong.

  6. Noooo!!! Not another Quango!

  7. When I wonder. There’s a time limit on accepting the 75K. I’ll place a small bet that any new board won’t be set up until well after this and there’ll be no extension of the current cut off date. A bit pointless.

    Speaking of which, what has the current board been doing if it’s not what they are now suggesting ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021


Subscribe For Latest Blog Updates

Tags

Alan Bates alice perkins Alwen Lyons Andrew Winn Andy Dunks Andy Parsons angela van den bogerd Bates v Post Office BBC Bonusgate CCRC Chris Aujard Clarke Advice False Accounts Fujitsu Gareth Jenkins Grabiner HCAB Horizon Hugh Flemington Inquiry Interim Report Janet Skinner Jarnail Singh Lee Castleton Lord Arbuthnot Mark Davies Nicki Arch Nick Read Noel Thomas Pam Stubbs Paula Vennells Paul Marshall Post Office Receipts and Payments mismatch bug Rob Wilson Rod Ismay Rodric Williams Second Sight Seema Misra ShEx Simon Clarke Susan Crichton Tracy Felstead UKGI

Categories